President Biden's decision to pardon his son, Hunter, has ignited controversy and raised serious questions about fairness and impartiality within the American justice system. From the outset, the president's repeated denials of any intention to pardon Hunter foreshadowed the eventual outcome. This pattern of dishonesty is consistent with Biden's history, marked by fabrications and falsehoods dating back to his early political career.

The pardon itself was a calculated political maneuver, discussed as early as June when Hunter's legal troubles began. The White House deliberately misled the public, claiming the president wouldn't intervene, while simultaneously keeping the option open. This deception was motivated by a desire to protect the Democrats' electoral prospects, prioritizing political expediency over transparency and ethical conduct.

Furthermore, the pardon's scope extends far beyond the specific convictions in Delaware and California. It provides blanket immunity for any potential offenses Hunter may have committed during a decade of alleged influence peddling, effectively shielding him from future prosecution for a range of serious federal crimes. This sweeping pardon conveniently eliminates the possibility of further investigations into Hunter's dealings, which could potentially implicate President Biden himself.

Evidence from Hunter's laptop suggests Joe Biden's involvement in these questionable financial dealings. The president's efforts to protect his son also serve to protect himself from scrutiny. The Justice Department's handling of the case, as described by IRS whistleblowers, reveals a pattern of favoritism towards Hunter, hindering investigations and allowing statutes of limitations to expire.

President Biden's justification for the pardon, citing selective prosecution and a miscarriage of justice, rings hollow in light of the evidence. His claim that tax offenses and gun charges are typically handled leniently is demonstrably false. The president's contradictory statements and actions expose his hypocrisy and further erode public trust in the legal system.

Ultimately, the Biden pardon saga underscores a disturbing trend of political self-preservation and abuse of power. By obstructing justice and shielding his son from accountability, President Biden has undermined the principle of equal justice under law and fueled skepticism about the integrity of the American legal system.