The online world is buzzing with reactions from TikTok influencers following the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a federal law that could ban the platform unless it's sold to a U.S. buyer. Many creators are expressing their disappointment and concern over the potential loss of their income, community, and creative outlet.

Influencers like Emily Senn, who found a new career path on TikTok after losing her job during the pandemic, expressed emotional distress over the ruling, questioning the government's decision to potentially disrupt the livelihoods of millions. Senn voiced her frustration and distrust in the government for targeting TikTok.

Madilynn Cameron, another influencer with a substantial following, urged her followers to remain optimistic about potential intervention from President Biden or President-elect Trump. She also criticized the U.S. government, suggesting that the country is becoming a subject of ridicule on the international stage due to its actions against TikTok.

Other prominent TikTok personalities echoed these sentiments. Kelsey Pumel, a popular content creator, questioned the government's priorities in a video titled "Goodbye freedom of speech." She expressed disbelief that the government's focus seems to be on an app that, in her view, hasn't demonstrated the alleged threats, while overlooking other pressing societal issues like school safety, healthcare, and homelessness.

Podcast host Alex Pearlman also voiced his frustration, criticizing the government's seeming inability to reach consensus on critical issues like gun violence and healthcare, while swiftly uniting on the TikTok ban. He used strong language to express his disapproval of the decision.

The Supreme Court's ruling affirms a lower court's decision and acknowledges the platform's significance as a means of expression and community for over 170 million Americans. However, it also underscores Congress's concerns about national security related to TikTok's data collection practices and its ties to a foreign adversary. The court concluded that the divestiture requirement doesn't infringe on First Amendment rights.

This decision arrives as President-elect Trump has recently hinted at potential support for the app. The timing and potential implications of the ruling remain to be seen.