The Biden administration's decision to halt new coal mining in Wyoming's Powder River Basin, a major coal-producing region, has sparked controversy and could be overturned under the incoming Trump administration. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) recently amended its Resource Management Plan, effectively banning new federal coal leases in the basin until 2041, citing climate change concerns. This move impacts a region responsible for approximately 40% of the nation's coal production, although existing leases will remain unaffected.

President-elect Trump, during his campaign, emphasized his commitment to U.S. energy dominance. A spokesperson for the Trump transition team criticized the Biden administration's energy policies, highlighting rising energy costs and inflation. They reiterated Trump's pledge to prioritize American energy production, protect energy-related jobs, and reduce the cost of living for families.

The ban on new leases in the Powder River Basin, spanning parts of Montana and Wyoming, encompasses over 1.7 million acres within the Miles City Field Office planning area. The BLM justified the decision by arguing that the U.S. energy market is shifting towards natural gas and renewable energy sources. However, officials from the affected states maintain that the region is a crucial natural energy resource.

Montana and Wyoming officials have strongly condemned the decision. Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) plans to introduce legislation to overturn the ban, emphasizing the importance of the Powder River Basin for national security, the energy grid, and job creation. Montana Governor Greg Gianforte (R-MT) criticized the administration for undermining states' rights and jeopardizing coal jobs and public education funding. Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) also expressed his disapproval and pledged to work with President Trump to reverse the decision.

The BLM maintains that the leasing ban aligns with Biden's goal of achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Environmental groups like Earth Justice have also supported the ban, arguing that it reflects a necessary transition away from coal towards cleaner energy sources. They advocate for supporting communities and workers during this transition and focusing on environmental restoration.