A crucial deadline looms, holding significant implications for the numerous criminal charges against Hunter Biden and the intricate web connecting him to President Biden and his family. On July 26, Federal Judge Maryellen Noreika faces a pivotal decision: accept the controversial plea deal orchestrated by Attorney General Merrick Garland or uphold unbiased justice by postponing the matter to allow for a thorough investigation.

This case transcends fabricated narratives. Hunter Biden's alleged offenses are serious and potentially implicate the president, demanding the weight they deserve under the law. IRS whistleblower testimony, disclosed by the Ways and Means Committee, alleges years of delays and cover-ups within the DOJ and IRS regarding the investigation into Hunter and potentially Joe Biden.

This testimony includes claims from U.S. Attorney David Weiss, who recommended the plea deal, that DOJ officials in Washington blocked tax charges against Hunter. These claims contradict public statements by Garland and Weiss himself, raising further questions. Furthermore, the Ways and Means Committee revealed alleged retaliation against the whistleblowers, who were removed from the case.

This incident marks the latest in a series of alleged attempts to obstruct and conceal the investigation into Hunter Biden's business dealings. Garland and Weiss now seek Judge Noreika's approval of a plea deal, despite IRS findings that Hunter Biden failed to pay substantial taxes on millions earned from foreign entities. Even Democratic members of the Ways and Means Committee acknowledge the need for further investigation. Accepting a plea deal prematurely would be a miscarriage of justice.

Despite IRS investigators recommending felony charges, Hunter Biden appears to have benefited from preferential treatment. This proposed plea deal would effectively allow him to evade serious consequences, raising concerns about a two-tiered justice system. A recent case involving similar charges resulted in a prison sentence, highlighting the disparity.

The timing of the plea deal, shortly before the release of the whistleblower testimony, raises suspicions. It leads one to question whether charges would have been filed at all without the Ways and Means Committee's investigation. This plea deal appears to be a blatant attempt to shield Hunter Biden and obstruct further investigation into potential corruption involving the Biden family. Judge Noreika should reject this compromised agreement.