Fox News contributors Charlie Hurt and Rachel Campos-Duffy recently discussed inaugural fashion on 'Fox & Friends Weekend,' highlighting a Vogue article criticizing Melania Trump's White House portrait attire. Writer Hannah Jackson, known for pieces like "Hailey Bieber Is Reviving the Pantless Trend in 2025" and "Let a Pair of Zany Sunglasses Revive Your Winter Style," took issue with the former First Lady's choice of a tuxedo for the portrait.

Jackson argued that the tuxedo made Trump resemble a "freelance magician" rather than a public servant, suggesting it was a theatrical choice that disregarded tradition. However, many found Melania's look striking and powerful, blending business attire with a feminine touch. Her portrait projects a sense of resolve, a noticeable shift from her earlier public image.

The Vogue critique seems to ignore the numerous departures from tradition during the previous administration, focusing instead on a sartorial choice. This contrasts sharply with their coverage of First Lady Jill Biden, who received glowing praise even amidst criticism of her husband's performance. The article also overlooks Melania's influence as a fashion icon, particularly her ability to make trends accessible to the public, as seen with the resurgence of skinny jeans after she wore them.

Vogue's criticism seems rooted in their declining influence. Their focus on high-end, often impractical fashion has lost relevance with a broader audience who appreciate Melania's more relatable style. The magazine's historical exclusion of Melania and Ivanka Trump from their covers further suggests a political bias, aligning with their past coverage of topics like defunding the police.

Another Vogue writer, Christian Allaire, criticized Ivanka Trump's inauguration gown, contrasting it with Jill Biden's "patriotic wardrobe." This critique of "artifice" coming from a magazine known for its highly stylized and often unrealistic portrayal of fashion seems ironic. While Vogue may struggle to understand Melania Trump's "sartorial messaging," the public clearly receives it, further highlighting the disconnect between the magazine and its dwindling audience.