Former President Donald Trump seems to be projecting a softer image. But is this genuine, or a calculated strategy? Having interviewed him twice this year, including shortly before the election, I observed a more focused and substantive approach, seemingly aimed at independent voters. While still throwing some campaign-style jabs, he appeared relatively restrained.

This more composed demeanor was also evident in his recent "Meet the Press" interview. While Kristen Welker's persistent questioning elicited a "nasty" comment, it was a far cry from his past rally performances, where he'd digress into unrelated topics. His statement on NBC about representing even those who didn't vote for him contrasts sharply with the tone of his 2017 inaugural address.

However, Trump retains his knack for ambiguous pronouncements and veiled messaging. Even the Washington Post editorial board, hardly his biggest fans, acknowledged his attempt at a conciliatory tone, backed by some substance. He declared he wouldn't remove Fed Chair Jerome Powell, expressed willingness to collaborate with Democrats on DACA, and affirmed his stance on abortion medication access and NATO participation, contingent on other members' defense spending.

Having secured the presidency again, Trump is in a position to reshape his legacy. He's aware of the criticism he faced during his first term and, with some staff changes, aims for a more successful second term. He has emphasized that success is the best revenge, echoing a sentiment he shared with me. He even retracted his campaign promise to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Joe Biden.

In the "Meet the Press" interview, Trump stated that any investigation into the Biden administration would be the prerogative of his attorney general and FBI director, likely Pam Bondi and potentially Kash Patel. While he wouldn't directly order it, publicly mentioning it could be interpreted as a suggestion. This distancing tactic, while subtle, speaks volumes.

However, Trump's criticism of the House January 6th Committee members, accusing them of destroying evidence and suggesting imprisonment, provided ammunition for his detractors. His senior advisor, Jason Miller, claimed the comments were taken out of context, emphasizing Trump's desire for equal application of the law. Similarly, despite promising outreach to critical media outlets, Trump hasn't entirely refrained from criticizing journalists, as seen in his remarks about Maggie Haberman.

So, are we witnessing a genuine evolution, "Trump 2.0," or simply a repackaged version of the former president? Those familiar with Trump understand his propensity for sharp responses when provoked. However, his current approach suggests a more disciplined and moderate stance. While campaigning on disruption, setting the stage for future conflicts, his present focus seems to be on governing, particularly as President Biden has taken a step back from public engagement.